- Boxes
- definitions
- Ellipses
- theorems and lemmas
- Blue border
- the statement of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Orange border
- the statement of this result is not ready to be formalized; the blueprint needs more work
- Blue background
- the proof of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Green border
- the statement of this result is formalized
- Green background
- the proof of this result is formalized
- Dark green background
- the proof of this result and all its ancestors are formalized
- Dark green border
- this is in Mathlib
If we have two families \((\beta _i)_{i\in I}\) and \((\gamma _i)_{i\in I}\) of additive commutative monoids such that for every \(i\in I\), we have an additive bijection \(\varphi _i\) between \(\beta _i\) and \(\gamma _i\), then we have an additive bijection between \(\bigoplus \limits _{i\in I}\beta _i\) and \(\bigoplus \limits _{i\in I}\gamma _i\).
We send \(\sum \limits _{i\in I}x_i\) on \(\sum \limits _{i\in I}\varphi (x_i)\) and we check that it’s an additive bijection.
Let \(A\) be a semiring. If we have two families \((\beta _i)_{i\in I}\) and \((\gamma _i)_{i\in I}\) of additive commutative monoids such that for every \(i\in I\), \(\beta _i\) and \(\gamma _i\) are \(A-\)module and we have a \(A-\)linear bijection \(\varphi _i\) between \(\beta _i\) and \(\gamma _i\), then we have a \(A\) linear bijection between \(\bigoplus \limits _{i\in I}\beta _i\) and \(\bigoplus \limits _{i\in I}\gamma _i\).
We take the map defined in 19 which became \(A-\)linear by the new properties of the \(\beta _i\) and \(\gamma _i\).
We define a map on \(\mathcal{S}_{G/\mathcal{Z}_G}\) that associates to every elements \(g\in \mathcal{S}_{G/\mathcal{Z}_G}\) the natural element of \(\bigoplus \limits _{s\in \mathcal{S}_{G/\mathcal{Z}_G}}\mathbb {K}[\mathcal{Z}_G]\), that is \(1\) of \(\mathbb {K}[\mathcal{Z}_G]\) on the \(g-\)th component and 0 elsewhere.
If \(H\) is a subgroup of \(G\) a finite group, and if \(f\) is a function over \(H\), we define a central function \(f_G\) over \(G\) (called the induced central function on \(f\)) by the formula :
We check the axiom by reordering the sum with the bijection \(x\mapsto g^{-1}x\).
We have an isomorphism between \(\mathbb {K}[G]\otimes _{\mathbb {K}[\mathcal{Z}_G]}V_\theta \) and \(\bigoplus \limits _{g\in \mathcal{S}_{G/\mathcal{Z}_G}}W_g=\bigoplus \limits _{g\in \mathcal{S}_{G/\mathcal{Z}_G}} g \mathbb {K}[\mathcal{Z}_G] \otimes _{\mathbb {K}[\mathcal{Z}_G]} V_\theta \).
We get the resultat with the isomorphism \(\mathbb {K}[G] \cong \otimes _{\mathbb {K}[\mathcal{Z}_G]} g\mathbb {K}[\mathcal{Z}_G]\) defined in 51.
Given \(G\) a group, \(\mathbb {K}\) a field, \(W\) a \(k\) vector space and \(\theta \) a representation of \(\mathcal{Z}_G\) on \(W\), we define the tensor product \(V:=\mathbb {K}[G]\otimes _{\mathbb {K}[\mathcal{Z}_G]}V_\theta \), where \(V_\theta \) is the \(\mathbb {K}[\mathcal{Z}_G]\) module associated to \(\theta \).
Let \(A\) be ring, \(B\) an \(A-\)algebra, \(M\) an \(A-\)module and \(N\) a \(B-\)module. Then, \(\text{Hom}_B((B\otimes _AM),N)\cong \text{Hom}_A(M,N)\).
We consider the map sending \(\varphi \in \text{Hom}_B((B\otimes _AM),N)\) to the \(A-\)linear map \(\Phi _\varphi : M \rightarrow N\) defined by \(\Phi _\varphi (x)=\varphi (1\otimes _A x)\) for every \(x\in M\). It is injective : if \(\Phi _{\varphi _1}=\Phi _{\varphi _2}\), then \(\varphi _1(1\otimes _A x)=\varphi _2(1\otimes _A x)\) for every \(x\in M\). Thus \(\varphi _1=\varphi _2\) by \(B-\)linearity. It is surjective : let \(\varphi \) be a \(A\)-linear map from \(M\) to \(N\). Let consider the \(B-\)linear map \(\psi \) from \(B\otimes _AM\) to \(N\) define by \(\psi (b\otimes _A m) = b \varphi (m)\). We have then \(\Psi _\psi (x)=\psi (1\otimes _A x)= \varphi (x)\).
We define the system of representatives of \(G/\mathcal{Z}_G\) by picking up exactly one element in every classes. We denote it by \(\mathcal{S}_{G/\mathcal{Z}_G}\) from now on and denote by \(C_s\) the classe of \(s\).
To do that in \(LEAN\), we take the image of \(G\) by the map \(G \rightarrow G/\mathcal{Z}_G\to G\).
Let \(I\) be a finite set and \((\beta _i)_{i\in I}\) a family of additive commutative monoids. Let \(\Phi \) be the natural map sending \(\beta _{i_0}\) to \(\bigoplus \limits _{i\in I}\beta _i\). Then, for every \(x:=(x_i)_{i\in I}\) such that \(x_i\in \beta _i\) for all \(i\in I\), then for every \(j\in I\), the following equality holds : \(\left(\sum \limits _{i\in I} \Phi (x_i)\right)_j=x_j\).
Let \(E\) be a \(\mathbb {K}[G]\) module. We have an isomorphism \(Hom_{\mathbb {K}[G]} \left(\mathbb {K}[G]\otimes _{\mathbb {K}[\mathcal{Z}_G]}V_\theta ,\ E\right)\simeq Hom_{\mathbb {K}[\mathcal{Z}_G]} \left(\mathbb {K}[\mathcal{Z}_G]\otimes _{\mathbb {K}[\mathcal{Z}_G]}V_\theta ,\ E\right)\).