Weil representations associated to finite fields

3 Heisenberg’s group

3.1 Construction

Definition 80 Structure of Heisenberg
#

Given \(k\) a field, \(V\) a \(k\) vector space and \(V^*\) its dual vector space, we define the Heisenberg set associated to \(V\) by \(\mathcal{H}(V):=\{ (z,x,y) \in k\times V\times V^*\} \).

Proposition 81 Trivial bijection
#

\(\mathcal{H}(V)\) is in bijection with \(k\times V\times V^*\).

Proof

Trivial.

Definition 82 Multiplication on Heisenberg
#

We define an internal law on Heisenberg by the following formula : \((z_1,x_1,y_1)*(z_2,x_2,y_2) = (z_1+z_2+y_1(x_2),x_1+x_2,y_1+y_2)\) for every \((z_1,x_1,y_1),(z_2,x_2,y_2)\in \mathcal{H}(V)\).

Definition 83 Inverse of an element of Heisenberg
#

The inverse of \((z,x,y)\in \mathcal{H}(V)\) is given by the formula \((-z- y(-x), - x ,- y)\).

Proof

Compute \(h*h^{-1}\).

Proposition 84 Heisenberg’s group

Heisenberg is a group for the the internal law defined in 82.

Proof

We check the axioms of a group.

Definition 85 Bijectivity with \(\mathcal{H}(V*)\)
#

Under our identification of the bidual, the map \(\Phi : (z,x,y) \mapsto (z,y,x)\) defines a bijection between \(\mathcal{H}(V)\) and \(\mathcal{H}(V^*)\).

Proof

Compute \(\Phi \circ \Phi ^{-1}\) and \(\Phi ^{-1}\circ \Phi \).

Definition 86 Antiisomorphic with \(\mathcal{H}(V*)\)
#

Under our identification of the bidual, the map define in 85 is a group antiisomorphism from \(\mathcal{H}(V)\) to \(\mathcal{H}(V^*)\).

Proof

Compute that \(\Phi (h_1*h_2)=\Phi (h_2)*\Phi (h_1)\).

3.2 Center

Definition 87 Center of Heisenberg
#

We define the center of \(\mathcal{H}(V)\) by the set \(\mathcal{Z}_{\mathcal{H}(V)}:=\{ (z,0,0)\in \mathcal{H}(V),\ z\in k\} \)

Proposition 88 The center is a subgroup

The center of Heisenberg \(\mathcal{Z}_{\mathcal{H}(V)}\) is a subgroup of \(\mathcal{H}(V)\).

Proof

We check the axioms and compute.

Proposition 89 Caracterisation of the center
#

The set define in 87 is indeed the center of \(\mathcal{H}(V)\).

Proof

By double inclusion. Reciprocity use the fact that the quadratic form 78 is a non degeneracy one (see 79 for a proof).

3.3 Commutator and nilpotency

Proposition 90 Commutator
#

Let \(H_1:=(z_1,x_1,y_1)\) and \(H_2:=(z_2,x_2,y_2)\) be two elements of \(\mathcal{H}(V)\). The commutator of \([H_1,H_2]\) is \((y_1(x_2)-y_2(x_1),0,0)\).

Proof

We compute \(H_1*H_2*H_1^{-1}*H_2^{-1}\).

Proposition 91 Commutator isn’t trivial
#

If \(V\) isn’t trivial, the subgroup of \(\mathcal{H}(V)\) generates by commutators isn’t trivial too.

Proof

By contradiction. If it was trivial, every element of \(\mathcal{H}(V)\) would belong to its center. Because \(V\) isn’t trivial, there exists \(x\in V\) such that \(x\ne 0\). Thus, \((0,x,0)\) would belong to the center. But because of the definition of the center, \(x = 0\). We get a contradiction.

Proposition 92 Caracterisation of the commutator

If \(h:=(z,x,y)\) belongs to the commutator subgroup, then \(x=0\) and \(y=0\).

Proof

We compute.

Theorem 93 Nilpotency of Heisenberg’s group

If \(V\) isn’t trivial, \(\mathcal{H}(V)\) is a two step nilpotent group.

Proof

We have to show that the commutator isn’t trivial and that \([[\mathcal{H}(V),\mathcal{H}(V)],\mathcal{H}(V)]\) is trivial. The first point is done in 91. The second is some computation, using 92.

3.4 Short exact sequence

Definition 94 Homomorphism from \(k\) to \(\mathcal{H}(V)\)
#

The map \(\varphi :z\mapsto (z,0,0)\) defines a homomorphism from \((k,+)\) to \(\mathcal{H}(V)\).

Proof

Trivial.

Proposition 95 Injectivity of \(\varphi \)
#

The homomorphism defined in 94 is injective.

Proof

We suppose \(\varphi (x)=\varphi (y)\) and we show \(x=y\). No difficulties.

Definition 96 Homomorphism from \(\mathcal{H}(V)\) to \(V\times V^*\)
#

The map \(\psi :(z,x,y)\mapsto (x,y)\) defines a homomorphism from \(\mathcal{H}(V)\) to \(V\times V^*\).

Proof

Trivial.

Proposition 97 Surjectivity of \(\psi \)

The homomorphism defined in 96 is surjective.

Proof

Trivial.

Proposition 98 Short exact sequence
#

We have a short exact sequence \(0\rightarrow k \stackrel{\varphi }{\rightarrow } \mathcal{H}(V) \stackrel{\psi }{\rightarrow } V\times V^* \rightarrow 0\).

Proof

We check that the kernel of \(\psi \) is exactly the image of \(\varphi \).

Definition 99 \(\psi ^{-1}(V)\)
#

The pullback \(V\times \{ 0\} \) by \(\psi \) defines a subgroup of \(\mathcal{H}(V)\).

Proof

We check that it is a subgroup.

Proposition 100 Pullback is commutative

The subgroup defined in 99 is commutative.

Proof

Check that \(h_1*h2=h2*h1\).

Proposition 101 Pullback is normal

The subgroup defined in 99 is a normal subgroup of Heisenberg.

Proof

Check that \(g*h*g^{-1}\in \psi ^{-1}(V)\) for every \(g\in \mathcal{H}(V)\) and \(h\in \psi ^{-1}(V)\).

Proposition 102 Maximality of the pullback

The subgroup defined in 99 is maximal among the commutative subgroups of \(\mathcal{H}(V)\).

Proof

By contradiction. If it’s not, then there exists \(Q\) a commutative subgroup such that \(\psi ^{-1}(V)\subset Q\) and \(Q\ne \psi ^{-1}(V)\). Let \(q:=(z,x,y)\in Q\backslash \psi ^{-1}(V)\). In particular, we have for every \(h=(a,b,0)\in \psi ^{-1}(V)\) that \(x*h=h*x\). We compute this equality and find out that for every \(b\in V\), \(y(b)=0\). Thus \(y=0\) and \(q\in \psi ^{-1}(V)\). Contradiction.

Definition 103 \(\psi ^{-1}(V)\)
#

The pullback of \(\{ 0\} \times V^*\) by \(\psi \) defines a subgroup of \(\mathcal{H}(V)\).

Proof

We check the axioms.

Proposition 104 Commutativity of the pullback

The subgroup defined in 103 is commutative.

Proof

Check that \(h_1*h2=h2*h1\).

Proposition 105 Pullback is normal

The subgroup defined in 103 is ai normal subgroup of Heisenberg. .

Proof

Check that \(g*h*g^{-1}\in \psi ^{-1}(V^*)\) for every \(g\in \mathcal{H}(V)\) and \(h\in \psi ^{-1}(V^*)\).

Proposition 106 Maximality of the pullback

The subgroup defined in 103 is maximal among the commutative subgroups of \(\mathcal{H}(V)\).

Proof

By contradiction. If it’s not, then there exists \(Q\) a commutative subgroup such that \(\psi ^{-1}(V^*)\subset Q\) and \(Q\ne \psi ^{-1}(V^*)\). Let \(q:=(z,x,y)\in Q\backslash \psi ^{-1}(V^*)\). In particular, we have for every \(h=(a,0,b)\in \psi ^{-1}(V^*)\) that \(x*h=h*x\). We compute this equality and find out that for every \(b\in V^*\), \(b(x)=0\). Thus \(x=0\) and \(q\in \psi ^{-1}(V^*)\). Contradiction.

3.5 Specifities of the case \(k=\mathbb {F}_q\)

Proposition 107 Cardinality
#

If \(k\) is a finite field, then \(|\mathcal{H}(V)|=|k|\times |V|^2\).

Proof

With 81 we know \(\mathcal{H}(V)\cong k \times V \times V^*\). Because \(V\) is finite dimensional, \(|V|=|V^*|\), thus we get the result.

Proposition 108 Cardinality of the center
#

If \(k\) is a finite field, then \(|\mathcal{Z}_{\mathcal{H}(V)}|=|k|\).

Proof

Trivial, the center being isomorphic to \(k\).

Theorem 109 Index of the center
#

If \(k\) is a finite field, then \([\mathcal{H}(V):\mathcal{Z}_{\mathcal{H}(V)}]=|V|^2\).

Proof

We use the fact that \([\mathcal{H}(V):\mathcal{Z}_{\mathcal{H}(V)}]=\frac{|\mathcal{H}(V)|}{|\mathcal{Z}_{\mathcal{H}(V)}|}\). Given that \(|\mathcal{H}(V)|=|k|\times |V|^2\) (because of 107) and \(|\mathcal{Z}_{\mathcal{H}(V)}|=|k|\) (because of 108), we get the result.